<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ipv6 on bikkel|watje.org</title>
    <link>https://bikkel.org/tags/ipv6/</link>
    <description>Recent content in ipv6 on bikkel|watje.org</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://bikkel.org/tags/ipv6/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Why IPv4 versus IPv6?</title>
      <link>https://bikkel.org/posts/why_ipv6/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://bikkel.org/posts/why_ipv6/</guid>
      <description>MS Windows has supported IPv6 since 2008 and Linux has supported it since 2005. So why is it that your system is still using IPv4 to connect to the internet?
This is a response to : https://github.com/becarpenter/misc/blob/main/why6why.md https://lobste.rs/s/m0c78b/why_is_ipv6_so_complicated
The doc is insightful, but it misunderstands why IPv6 is still a pain.
It is also wrong about the &amp;ldquo;IPv8&amp;rdquo; option, which is actually nicely illustrated with the adoption of DNS-SEC and longer ATM frames.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
